Tuesday, 20 September 2016

Top Simulations for Aug-Sept

by Tate Skinner and Adam Dubrowski


1. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 12;16(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0726-x.
Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students?

Spence AD1, Derbyshire S2, Walsh IK2, Murray JM2.
Author information:
1The Clinical Skills Education Centre, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK. andy.spence@gmail.com.
2The Clinical Skills Education Centre, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK.

Abstract
BACKGROUND:
The use of simulation in medical education is increasing, with students taught and assessed using simulated patients and manikins. Medical students at Queen's University of Belfast are taught advanced life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation as part of the undergraduate curriculum. Teaching and feedback in these skills have been developed in Queen's University with high-fidelity manikins. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of video compared to verbal feedback in assessment of student cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance.
METHODS:
Final year students participated in this study using a high-fidelity manikin, in the Clinical Skills Centre, Queen's University Belfast. Cohort A received verbal feedback only on their performance and cohort B received video feedback only. Video analysis using 'StudioCode' software was distributed to students. Each group returned for a second scenario and evaluation 4 weeks later. An assessment tool was created for performance assessment, which included individual skill and global score evaluation.
RESULTS:
One hundred thirty eight final year medical students completed the study. 62 % were female and the mean age was 23.9 years. Students having video feedback had significantly greater improvement in overall scores compared to those receiving verbal feedback (p = 0.006, 95 % CI: 2.8-15.8). Individual skills, including ventilation quality and global score were significantly better with video feedback (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively) when compared with cohort A. There was a positive change in overall score for cohort B from session one to session two (p < 0.001, 95 % CI: 6.3-15.8) indicating video feedback significantly benefited skill retention. In addition, using video feedback showed a significant improvement in the global score (p < 0.001, 95 % CI: 3.3-7.2) and drug administration timing (p = 0.004, 95 % CI: 0.7-3.8) of cohort B participants, from session one to session two.
CONCLUSIONS:
There is increased use of simulation in medicine but a paucity of published data comparing feedback methods in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Our study shows the use of video feedback when teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective than verbal feedback, and enhances skill retention. This is one of the first studies to demonstrate the benefit of video feedback in cardiopulmonary resuscitation teaching.
PMID: 27519273 [PubMed - in process]

2. Br J Surg. 2016 Aug 18. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10236. [Epub ahead of print]
Systematic review of e-learning for surgical training.

Maertens H1, Madani A2, Landry T3, Vermassen F1, Van Herzeele I1, Aggarwal R2,4.
Author information:
1Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
2Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
3Montreal General Hospital Medical Library, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
4Steinberg Centre for Simulation and Interactive Learning, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Internet and software-based platforms (e-learning) have gained popularity as teaching tools in medical education. Despite widespread use, there is limited evidence to support their effectiveness for surgical training. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of e-learning as a teaching tool compared with no intervention and other methods of surgical training.
METHODS:
A systematic literature search of bibliographical databases was performed up to August 2015. Studies were included if they were RCTs assessing the effectiveness of an e-learning platform for teaching any surgical skill, compared with no intervention or another method of training.
RESULTS:
From 4704 studies screened, 87 were included with 7871 participants enrolled, comprising medical students (52 studies), trainees (51 studies), qualified surgeons (2 studies) and nurses (6 studies). E-learning tools were used for teaching cognitive (71 studies), psychomotor (36 studies) and non-technical (8 studies) skills. Tool features included multimedia (84 studies), interactive learning (60 studies), feedback (27 studies), assessment (26 studies), virtual patients (22 studies), virtual reality environment (11 studies), spaced education (7 studies), community discussions (2 studies) and gaming (2 studies). Overall, e-learning showed either greater or similar effectiveness compared with both no intervention (29 and 4 studies respectively) and non-e-learning interventions (29 and 22 studies respectively).
CONCLUSION:
Despite significant heterogeneity amongst platforms, e-learning is at least as effective as other methods of training.
© 2016 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

3.Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016 Aug 17. pii: S0385-8146(16)30225-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2016.07.017. [Epub ahead of print]
Papercraft temporal bone in the first step of anatomy education.

Hiraumi H1, Sato H2, Ito J3.
Author information:
1Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Kyoto College of Medical Health, Kyoto, Japan. Electronic address: hhiraumi@iwate-med.ac.jp.
2Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
3Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
(1) To compare temporal bone anatomy comprehension taught to speech therapy students with or without a papercraft model. (2) To explore the effect of papercraft simulation on the understanding of surgical approaches in first-year residents.
METHODS:
(1) One-hundred and ten speech therapy students were divided into three classes. The first class was taught with a lecture only. The students in the second class were given a lecture and a papercraft modeling task without instruction. The third class modeled a papercraft with instruction after the lecture. The students were tested on their understanding of temporal bone anatomy. (2) A questionnaire on the understanding of surgical approaches was completed by 10 residents before and after the papercraft modeling. The papercraft models were cut with scissors to simulate surgical approaches.
RESULTS:
(1) The average scores were 4.4/8 for the first class, 4.3/8 for the second class, and 6.3/8 for the third class. The third class had significantly better results than the other classes (p<0.01, Kruskal-Wallis test). (2) The average scores before and after the papercraft modeling and cutting were 2.6/7 and 4.9/7, respectively. The numerical rating scale score significantly improved (p<0.01, Wilcoxon signed-rank test).
CONCLUSION:
The instruction of the anatomy using a papercraft temporal bone model is effective in the first step of learning temporal bone anatomy and surgical approaches.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

4.Pediatr Radiol. 2016 Aug 25. [Epub ahead of print]
Evaluation of a pediatric fluoroscopy training module to improve performance of upper gastrointestinal procedures in neonates with bilious emesis.

Benya EC1,2, Wyers MR3,4, O'Brien EK5.
Author information:
1Department of Medical Imaging, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 E. Chicago Ave. #9, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. ebenya@luriechildrens.org.
2Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. ebenya@luriechildrens.org.
3Department of Medical Imaging, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 E. Chicago Ave. #9, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
4Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
5Department of Medical Education, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Life-threatening midgut volvulus usually occurs in infants with malrotation and requires rapid diagnosis and surgical treatment to prevent bowel necrosis and death. However, because of the low frequency of upper gastrointestinal studies performed in infants younger than 1 month, many diagnostic radiology residents finish their residency training having limited or no opportunity to perform or observe an upper gastrointestinal (GI) series for evaluation of bilious emesis in a neonate.
OBJECTIVE:
To determine whether adding simulated upper GI series on neonates with bilious emesis to the curriculum improves residents' skill and accuracy in diagnosing midgut volvulus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
We assessed the performance of 12 residents in training whose curriculum included simulated upper GI series (study group) and 10 traditionally trained residents (control group) using a multiple-choice test, checklist procedure evaluation and diagnostic accuracy scores for 3 randomly selected simulated upper GI series. We then compared the results from the study group that had simulation curriculum to the scores for the control group using the Mann-Whitney test. We also analyzed the scores for the study group obtained prior to and after simulation curriculum using Wilcoxon signed rank test.
RESULTS:
There was a significant difference in test scores (study group median = 84.5%, control group median = 67.2%, P=0.001), overall diagnostic accuracy (study group median = 100%, control group median = 50%, P=0.011) and checklist evaluation (study group median = 83.3%, control group median = 70.8%, P=0.025) for the residents in the study group who completed simulation curriculum compared with the control group. There was also a significant difference in multiple-choice test scores for the study group before and after completion of simulation curriculum (before simulation curriculum median = 56.9%, after simulation curriculum median = 84.5%, P=0.002), checklist evaluation (before simulation curriculum median = 58.3%, after simulation curriculum median = 83.3%, P=0.002) and overall diagnostic accuracy scores (before simulation curriculum median = 50%, after simulation curriculum median = 100%, P=0.024).
CONCLUSION:
Radiology residents had significantly higher scores on a multiple-choice test, checklist procedure evaluation and overall diagnostic accuracy after completing a structured pediatric fluoroscopy curriculum that included simulated neonatal upper GI series and when compared to a control group of traditionally trained residents.

5.Gut Liver. 2016 Sep 15;10(5):764-72. doi: 10.5009/gnl16044.
The Efficacy of a Newly Designed, Easy-to-Manufacture Training Simulator for Endoscopic Biopsy of the Stomach.

Ahn JY1, Lee JS1, Lee GH1, Lee JW1, Na HK1, Jung KW1, Lee JH1, Kim do H1, Choi KD1, Song HJ1, Jung HY1, Kim JH1.
Author information:
1Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS:
We developed a new endoscopic biopsy training simulator and determined its efficacy for improving the endoscopic biopsy skills of beginners.
METHODS:
This biopsy simulator, which presents seven biopsy sites, was constructed using readily available materials. We enrolled 40 participants: 14 residents, 11 first-year clinical fellows, 10 second-year clinical fellows, and five staff members. We recorded the simulation completion time for all participants, and then simulator performance was assessed via a questionnaire using the 7-point Likert scale.
RESULTS:
The mean times for completing the five trials were 417.7±138.8, 145.2±31.5, 112.7±21.9, and 90.5±20.0 seconds for the residents, first-year clinical fellows, second-year clinical fellows, and staff members, respectively. Endoscopists with less experience reported that they found this simulator more useful for improving their biopsy technique (6.8±0.4 in the resident group and 5.7±1.0 in the first-year clinical fellow group). The realism score of the simulator for endoscopic handling was 6.4±0.5 in the staff group.
CONCLUSIONS:
This new, easy-to-manufacture endoscopic biopsy simulator is useful for biopsy training for beginner endoscopists and shows good efficacy and realism.
PMID: 27563021 [PubMed - in process]

6.Med Educ. 2016 Sep;50(9):969-78. doi: 10.1111/medu.13107.
Influence of learner knowledge and case complexity on handover accuracy and cognitive load: results from a simulation study.

Young JQ1, van Dijk SM2, O'Sullivan PS3, Custers EJ2, Irby DM3, Ten Cate O2.
Author information:
1Department of Psychiatry, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA.
2Centre for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
3Research and Development of Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Abstract
CONTEXT:
The handover represents a high-risk event in which errors are common and lead to patient harm. A better understanding of the cognitive mechanisms of handover errors is essential to improving handover education and practice.
OBJECTIVES:
This paper reports on an experiment conducted to study the effects of learner knowledge, case complexity (i.e. cases with or without a clear diagnosis) and their interaction on handover accuracy and cognitive load.
METHODS:
Participants were 52 Dutch medical students in Years 2 and 6. The experiment employed a repeated-measures design with two explanatory variables: case complexity (simple or complex) as the within-subject variable, and learner knowledge (as indicated by illness script maturity) as the between-subject covariate. The dependent variables were handover accuracy and cognitive load. Each participant performed a total of four simulated handovers involving two simple cases and two complex cases.
RESULTS:
Higher illness script maturity predicted increased handover accuracy (p < 0.001) and lower cognitive load (p = 0.007). Case complexity did not independently affect either outcome. For handover accuracy, there was no interaction between case complexity and illness script maturity. For cognitive load, there was an interaction effect between illness script maturity and case complexity, indicating that more mature illness scripts reduced cognitive load less in complex cases than in simple cases.
CONCLUSIONS:
Students with more mature illness scripts performed more accurate handovers and experienced lower cognitive load. For cognitive load, these effects were more pronounced in simple than complex cases. If replicated, these findings suggest that handover curricula and protocols should provide support that varies according to the knowledge of the trainee.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.
PMID: 27562896 [PubMed - in process]

7.Med Educ. 2016 Sep;50(9):955-68. doi: 10.1111/medu.13086.
Thrive or overload? The effect of task complexity on novices' simulation-based learning.

Haji FA1,2,3, Cheung JJ1,2, Woods N1, Regehr G4, de Ribaupierre S3, Dubrowski A5.
Author information:
1Wilson Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2SickKids Learning Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
3Division of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
4Centre for Health Education Scholarship, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
5Division of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada.

Abstract
CONTEXT:
Fidelity is widely viewed as an important element of simulation instructional design based on its purported relationship with transfer of learning. However, higher levels of fidelity may increase task complexity to a point at which novices' cognitive resources become overloaded.
OBJECTIVES:
In this experiment, we investigate the effects of variations in task complexity on novices' cognitive load and learning during simulation-based procedural skills training.
METHODS:
Thirty-eight medical students were randomly assigned to simulation training on a simple or complex lumbar puncture (LP) task. Participants completed four practice trials on this task (skill acquisition). After 10 days of rest, all participants completed one additional trial on their assigned task (retention) and one trial on a 'very complex' simulation designed to be similar to the complex task (transfer). We assessed LP performance and cognitive load on each trial using multiple measures.
RESULTS:
In both groups, LP performance improved significantly during skill acquisition (p ≤ 0.047, f = 0.29-0.96) and was maintained at retention. The simple task group demonstrated superior performance compared with the complex task group throughout these phases (p ≤ 0.002, d = 1.13-2.31). Cognitive load declined significantly in the simple task group (p < 0.009, f = 0.48-0.76), but not in the complex task group during skill acquisition, and remained lower at retention (p ≤ 0.024, d = 0.78-1.39). Between retention and transfer, LP performance declined and cognitive load increased in the simple task group, whereas both remained stable in the complex task group. At transfer, no group differences were observed in LP performance and cognitive load, except that the simple task group made significantly fewer breaches of sterility (p = 0.023, d = 0.80).
CONCLUSIONS:
Reduced task complexity was associated with superior LP performance and lower cognitive load during skill acquisition and retention, but mixed results on transfer to a more complex task. These results indicate that task complexity is an important factor that may mediate (via cognitive overload) the relationship between instructional design elements (e.g. fidelity) and simulation-based learning outcomes.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.
PMID: 27562895 [PubMed - in process

8.Am J Surg. 2016 Aug 1. pii: S0002-9610(16)30380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.06.024. [Epub ahead of print]
Predicting surgical skill acquisition in preclinical medical students.

Martin AN1, Hu Y1, Le IA1, Brooks KD1, Mahmutovic A1, Choi J1, Kim H1, Rasmussen SK2.
Author information:
1Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
2Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Electronic address: skr3f@virginia.edu.

Abstract
BACKGROUND:
The purpose of this study was to identify factors that predict medical student success in acquiring invasive procedural skills. We hypothesized that students with interest in surgery and with prior procedural experience would have higher rates of success.
METHODS:
Preclinical students were enrolled in a simulation course comprised of suturing, intubation, and central venous catheterization. Students completed surveys to describe demographics, specialty interest area, prior experience, and confidence. Using linear regression, variables predictive of proficiency were identified.
RESULTS:
Forty-five participants completed the course. Under univariate analysis, composite pretest score was inversely associated with confidence (P = .039). Under multivariable analysis, female gender was associated with higher pretest suturing score (P = .016). Male gender (P = .029) and high confidence (P = .021) were associated with greater improvement in suturing.
CONCLUSIONS:
Among novices, higher confidence can predict lower baseline technical proficiency. Although females had higher pretest suturing scores, high confidence and male gender were associated with the greatest degree of improvement.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PMID: 27567113 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher

9.GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Aug 15;33(4):Doc56. doi: 10.3205/zma001055. eCollection 2016.
Mastery learning improves students skills in inserting intravenous access: a pre-post-study.

Friederichs H1, Brouwer B1, Marschall B2, Weissenstein A1.
Author information:
1University of Muenster, Studienhospital, Muenster, Germany.
2University of Muenster, Institute of Medical Education - IfAS, Muenster, Germany.

Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
Inserting peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) has been identified as a core competency for medical students. Because the performance - even of hygienic standards - of both students and novice physicians is frequently inadequate, medical faculties must focus on competence-based learning objectives and deliberate practice, features that are combined in mastery learning. Our aim was to determine the competency of students in inserting PVCs before and after an educational intervention.
DESIGN:
This study comprised a skills assessment with pre- and post-tests of a group of third-year students who received a simulation-based intervention. A newly established curriculum involved one hour of practice at inserting PVCs on simulators. Students were required to pass a test (total 21 points, pass mark 20 points) developed on the concept of mastery learning. An unannounced follow-up test was performed one week (8 days) after the intervention.
SETTING:
The simulation center of the medical faculty in Muenster.
PARTICIPANTS:
Third-year students who received the intervention.
RESULTS:
One hundred and nine complete data sets were obtained from 133 students (82.5%). Most students (97.2%) passed the test after the intervention (mean score increase from 15.56 to 20.50, P<0.001). There was a significant decrease in students' performance after one week (8 days): only 74.5% of participants passed this retest (mean score reduction from 20.50 to 20.06, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION:
Mastery learning is an effective form of teaching practical skills to medical students, allowing a thorough preparation for the challenges of daily clinical practice.
PMID: 27579356 [PubMed - in process]

10.Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015 Jul-Sep;28(3):204-6. doi: 10.1590/S0102-67202015000300015.
White box: low cost box for laparoscopic training.

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Martins JM1, Ribeiro RV1, Cavazzola LT1.
Author information:
1Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Laparoscopic surgery is a reality in almost all surgical centers. Although with initial greater technical difficulty for surgeons, the rapid return to activities, less postoperative pain and higher quality aesthetic stimulates surgeons to evolve technically in this area. However, unlike open surgery where learning opportunities are more accessible, the laparoscopic training represents a challenge in surgeon formation.
AIM:
To present a low cost model for laparoscopic training box.
METHODS:
This model is based in easily accessible materials; the equipment can be easily found based on chrome mini jet and passes rubber thread and a webcam attached to an aluminum handle.
RESULTS:
It can be finalized in two days costing R$ 280,00 (US$ 90).
CONCLUSION:
It is possible to stimulate a larger number of surgeons to have self training in laparoscopy at low cost seeking to improve their surgical skills outside the operating room

11.World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Aug 31;11(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0104-3. eCollection 2016.
Ex-vivo and live animal models are equally effective training for the management of a penetrating cardiac injury.

Izawa Y1, Hishikawa S2, Muronoi T3, Yamashita K3, Maruyama H4, Suzukawa M3, Lefor AK5.
Author information:
1Center of Development for Advanced Medical Technology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsukeshi, Tochigiken 329-0498 Japan ; Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsukeshi, Tochigiken 329-0498 Japan.
2Center of Development for Advanced Medical Technology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsukeshi, Tochigiken 329-0498 Japan ; Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsukeshi, Tochigiken 329-0498 Japan ; Department of Digestive Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsukeshi, Tochigiken 329-0498 Japan.
3Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsukeshi, Tochigiken 329-0498 Japan.
4Department of Digestive Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsukeshi, Tochigiken 329-0498 Japan.
5Center of Development for Advanced Medical Technology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsukeshi, Tochigiken 329-0498 Japan ; Department of Digestive Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsukeshi, Tochigiken 329-0498 Japan.

Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Live tissue models are considered the most useful simulation for training in the management for hemostasis of penetrating injuries. However, these models are expensive, with limited opportunities for repetitive training. Ex-vivo models using tissue and a fluid pump are less expensive, allow repetitive training and respect ethical principles in animal research. The purpose of this study is to objectively evaluate the effectiveness of ex-vivo training with a pump, compared to live animal model training. Staff surgeons and residents were divided into live tissue training and ex-vivo training groups. Training in the management of a penetrating cardiac injury was conducted for each group, separately. One week later, all participants were formally evaluated in the management of a penetrating cardiac injury in a live animal.
RESULTS:
There are no differences between the two groups regarding average years of experience or previous trauma surgery experience. All participants achieved hemostasis, with no difference between the two groups in the Global Rating Scale score (ex-vivo: 25.2 ± 6.3, live: 24.7 ± 6.3, p = 0.646), blood loss (1.6 ± 0.7, 2.0 ± 0.6, p = 0.051), checklist score (3.7 ± 0.6, 3.6 ± 0.9, p = 0.189), or time required for repair (101 s ± 31, 107 s ± 15, p = 0.163), except overall evaluation (3.8 ± 0.9, 3.4 ± 0.9, p = 0.037). The internal consistency reliability and inter-rater reliability in the Global Rating Scale were excellent (0.966 and 0.953 / 0.719 and 0.784, respectively), and for the checklist were moderate (0.570 and 0.636 / 0.651 and 0.607, respectively). The validity is rated good for both the Global Rating Scale (Residents: 21.7 ± 5.6, Staff: 28.9 ± 4.7, p = 0.000) and checklist (Residents: 3.4 ± 0.9, Staff Surgeons: 3.9 ± 0.3, p = 0.003). The results of self-assessment questionnaires were similarly high (4.2-4.9) with scores in self-efficacy increased after training (pre: 1.7 ± 0.8, post: 3.2 ± 1.0, p = 0.000 in ex-vivo, pre: 1.9 ± 1.0, post: 3.7 ± 0.7, p = 0.000 in live). Scores comparing pre-training and post-evaluation (pre: 1.7 ± 0.8, post: 3.7 ± 0.9, p = 0.000 in ex-vivo, pre: 1.9 ± 1.0, post: 3.8 ± 0.7, p = 0.000 in live) were increased.
CONCLUSION:
Training with an ex-vivo model and live tissue training are similar for the management of a penetrating cardiac injury, with increased self-efficacy of participants in both groups. The ex-vivo model is useful to learn hemostatic skills in trauma surgery.

12.West J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;16(6):907-12. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.10.26974. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
Correlation of Simulation Examination to Written Test Scores for Advanced Cardiac Life Support Testing: Prospective Cohort Study.

Strom SL1, Anderson CL2, Yang L3, Canales C 3, Amin A4, Lotfipour S2, McCoy CE2, Langdorf MI2.
Author information:
1University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, Irvine, California.
2University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Department of Emergency.
3Medicine, Irvine, California.
4University of California Irvine, Irvine, CaliforniaUniversity of California Irvine School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Irvine, California.

Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
Traditional Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) courses are evaluated using written multiple-choice tests. High-fidelity simulation is a widely used adjunct to didactic content, and has been used in many specialties as a training resource as well as an evaluative tool. There are no data to our knowledge that compare simulation examination scores with written test scores for ACLS courses.
OBJECTIVE:
To compare and correlate a novel high-fidelity simulation-based evaluation with traditional written testing for senior medical students in an ACLS course.
METHODS:
We performed a prospective cohort study to determine the correlation between simulation-based evaluation and traditional written testing in a medical school simulation center. Students were tested on a standard acute coronary syndrome/ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest scenario. Our primary outcome measure was correlation of exam results for 19 volunteer fourth-year medical students after a 32-hour ACLS-based Resuscitation Boot Camp course. Our secondary outcome was comparison of simulation-based vs. written outcome scores.
RESULTS:
The composite average score on the written evaluation was substantially higher (93.6%) than the simulation performance score (81.3%, absolute difference 12.3%, 95% CI [10.6-14.0%], p<0.00005). We found a statistically significant moderate correlation between simulation scenario test performance and traditional written testing (Pearson r=0.48, p=0.04), validating the new evaluation method.
CONCLUSION:
Simulation-based ACLS evaluation methods correlate with traditional written testing and demonstrate resuscitation knowledge and skills. Simulation may be a more discriminating and challenging testing method, as students scored higher on written evaluation methods compared to simulation.


13.BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 7;16:475. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1683-0.
The impact of web-based and face-to-face simulation on patient deterioration and patient safety: protocol for a multi-site multi-method design.

Cooper SJ1, Kinsman L2, Chung C3, Cant R3, Boyle J4, Bull L5, Cameron A6, Connell C7, Kim JA3, McInnes D8, McKay A2, Nankervis K5, Penz E9, Rotter T10.
Author information:
1School of Nursing Midwifery and Healthcare, Federation University Australia, Churchill, Victoria 3842 and Mt. Helen, Victoria 3350, Australia. s.cooper@federation.edu.au.
2School of Nursing, The University of Tasmania, PO Box 1322, Launceston, Tasmania, 7250, Australia.
3School of Nursing Midwifery and Healthcare, Federation University Australia, Churchill, Victoria 3842 and Mt. Helen, Victoria 3350, Australia.
4St John of God Health Care Berwick, Gibb St, Berwick, Victoria, 3806, Australia.
5Department of Nursing and Midwifery Education and Strategy, Monash Health, Clayton Rd, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
6Latrobe Regional Hospital, 10 Village Ave, Traralgon, VIC, 3844, Australia.
7Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, McMahons Rd, Frankston, Victoria, 3199, Australia.
8Central Gippsland Health Service, 155 Guthridge Parade, Sale, VIC, 3850, Australia.
9College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.
10College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.

Abstract
BACKGROUND:
There are international concerns in relation to the management of patient deterioration which has led to a body of evidence known as the 'failure to rescue' literature. Nursing staff are known to miss cues of deterioration and often fail to call for assistance. Medical Emergency Teams (Rapid Response Teams) do improve the management of acutely deteriorating patients, but first responders need the requisite skills to impact on patient safety.
METHODS/DESIGN:
In this study we aim to address these issues in a mixed methods interventional trial with the objective of measuring and comparing the cost and clinical impact of face-to-face and web-based simulation programs on the management of patient deterioration and related patient outcomes. The education programs, known as 'FIRST(2)ACT', have been found to have an impact on education and will be tested in four hospitals in the State of Victoria, Australia. Nursing staff will be trained in primary (the first 8 min) responses to emergencies in two medical wards using a face-to-face approach and in two medical wards using a web-based version FIRST(2)ACTWeb. The impact of these interventions will be determined through quantitative and qualitative approaches, cost analyses and patient notes review (time series analyses) to measure quality of care and patient outcomes.
DISCUSSION:
In this 18 month study it is hypothesised that both simulation programs will improve the detection and management of deteriorating patients but that the web-based program will have lower total costs. The study will also add to our overall understanding of the utility of simulation approaches in the preparation of nurses working in hospital wards. (ACTRN12616000468426, retrospectively registered 8.4.2016).
PMID: 27604599 [PubMed - in process]

14.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Sep 9:1-5. [Epub ahead of print]
Simulation-Based Training May Improve Resident Skill in Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy.

Fulton N1, Buethe J1, Gollamudi J1, Robbin M1.
Author information:
11 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106.

Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study was to determine whether simulation-based training can improve resident performance in ultrasound-guided biopsy.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS:
Forty radiology residents from a single academic institution enrolled in the study. Each resident performed an initial biopsy on an abdominal imaging phantom using direct ultrasound guidance. Twenty of the residents underwent a 30-minute training session with the phantom device, and 20 residents received no additional training. The residents performed a repeat biopsy of the same lesion and were graded on overall procedure time, number of skin surface punctures, number of gross needle adjustments, and subjective performance as determined by a blinded grader.
RESULTS:
Residents who participated in the training had a statistically significant 92.3-second reduction in procedure time (68% improvement, p = 0.01), 1.1 reduction in number of skin punctures per biopsy (50% improvement, p = 0.05), 2.5 reduction in number of needle adjustments (66% improvement, p = 0.04), and an increase of 0.85 points in score on a 5-point Likert grading scale (23% improvement, p < 0.01). Residents who did not receive any additional training did not improve in any performance metric.
CONCLUSION:
Simulation-based training improves overall procedure time, number of skin punctures and needle adjustments, and subjective performance.

15.World Neurosurg. 2016 Sep 6. pii: S1878-8750(16)30802-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.118. [Epub ahead of print]
Coconut Model for Learning First Steps of Craniotomy Techniques and CSF Leak Avoidance.

Braga BD1, Peleja SB2, Macedo G3, Drummond CR4, Costa PH5, Garcia-Zapata MT6, Oliveira MM7.
Author information:
1Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Goiânia and Pontificial Catholic University of Goiás, Brazil; Goiânia General Hospital, Goiás, Brazil; Federal University of Goiás, Brazil. Electronic address: bernardodrummond@yahoo.com.br.
2Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Goiânia and Pontificial Catholic University of Goiás, Brazil; Goiânia General Hospital, Goiás, Brazil.
3 Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Goiânia and Pontificial Catholic University of Goiás, Brazil.
4Goiânia General Hospital, Goiás, Brazil.
5Department of Surgery, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
6Federal University of Goiás, Brazil.
7Federal University of Goiás, Brazil; Department of Surgery, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
Neurosurgery simulation has gained attention recently due to changes in the medical system. First-year neurosurgical residents in low-income countries usually perform their first craniotomy on a real subject. Development of high-fidelity, cheap, and largely available simulators is a challenge in residency training. An original model for the first steps of craniotomy with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak avoidance practice using a coconut is described.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
The coconut is a drupe from Cocos nucifera L. (coconut tree). The green coconut has four layers and some similarity can be seen between these layers and the human skull. The materials used in the simulation are the same as those used in the operating room.
PROCEDURE:
The coconut is placed on the head holder support with the face up. The burr holes are made until endocarp is reached. The mesocarp is dissected, and the conductor is passed from one hole to the other with the Gigli saw. The hook handle for the wire saw is positioned, and the mesocarp and endocarp are cut. After sawing the four margins, mesocarp is detached from endocarp. Four burr holes are made from endocarp to endosperm. Careful dissection of the endosperm is done, avoiding liquid albumen leak. The Gigli saw is passed through the trephine holes. Hooks are placed, and the endocarp is cut. After cutting the four margins, it is dissected from the endosperm and removed. The main goal of the procedure is to remove the endocarp without fluid leakage.
DISCUSSION:
The coconut model for learning the first steps of craniotomy and CSF leak avoidance has some limitations. It is more realistic while trying to remove the endocarp without damage to the endosperm. It is also cheap and can be widely used in low-income countries. However, the coconut does not have anatomical landmarks. The mesocarp makes the model less realistic because it has fibers that make the procedure more difficult and different from a real craniotomy.
CONCLUSION:
The model has a potential pedagogic neurosurgical application for freshman residents before they perform a real craniotomy for the first time. Further validity is necessary to confirm this hypothesis.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PMID: 27613497 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

16. Revisiting ‘A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009’

Authors
William C McGaghie,
S Barry Issenberg,
Emil R Petrusa,
Ross J Scalese
First published: 15 September 2016Full publication history
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12795View/save citation

Objectives
This article reviews and critically evaluates historical and contemporary research on simulation-based medical education (SBME). It also presents and discusses 12 features and best practices of SBME that teachers should know in order to use medical simulation technology to maximum educational benefit.
Methods
This Qualitative synthesis of SBME research and scholarship was carried out in two stages. Firstly, we summarised the results of three SBME research reviews covering the years 1969-2003. Secondly, we performed a selective critical review of SBME research and scholarship published during 2003-2009.
Results
The historical and contemporary research synthesis is reported to inform the medical education community about 12 features and best practices of SBME: (i) feedback; (ii)deliberate practice; (iii) curriculum integration; (iv) outcome measurement; (v) simulation fidelity;(vi) skill acquisition and maintenance; (vii) mastery learning; (viii) transfer to practice; (ix) team training; (x) high-stakes testing; (xi) instructor training; and (xii) educational and professional context. Each of these is discussed in the light of available evidence. The scientific quality of contemporary SBME research is much improved compared with the historical record.
Conclusions

Development of and research into SBME have grown and matured over the past 40 years on substantive and methodological grounds. We believe the impact and educational utility of SBME are likely to increase in the future. More thematic programmes of research are needed. Simulation-based medical education is a complex service intervention that needs to be planned and practised with attention to organisational contexts.

Thursday, 18 August 2016

Top Simulations- July-Aug

  by Tate Skinner and Adam Dubrowski


  
     1. Simul Healthc. 2016 Jun;11(3):181-9. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000142.

      Using Virtual Patients to Teach Empathy: A Randomized Controlled Study to Enhance Medical Students' Empathic Communication.

  

      Author information

      Abstract
      INTRODUCTION:
    Physician empathy is a complex phenomenon known to improve illness outcomes; however, few tools are available for deliberate practice of empathy. We used a virtual patient (VP) to teach empathic communication to first-year medical students. We then evaluated students' verbal empathy in a standardized patient (SP) interaction.
      METHODS:
    Seventy medical students, randomly assigned to 3 separate study groups, interacted with (1) a control VP portraying depression, (2) a VP with a backstory simulating patient shadowing, or (3) a VP able to give immediate feedback about empathic communication (empathy-feedback VP). Subsequently, the students interviewed an SP portraying a scenario that included opportunities to express empathy. All SP interviews were recorded and transcribed. The study outcomes were (1) the students' verbal response to the empathic opportunities presented by the SP, as coded by reliable assessors using the Empathic Communication Coding System, and (2) the students' responses as coded by the SPs, using a communication checklist.
      RESULTS:
     There were no significant differences in student demographics between groups. The students who interacted with the empathy-feedback VP showed higher empathy in the SP interview than did the students in the backstory VP and the control VP groups [mean (SD) empathy scores coded on a 0-6 scale were 2.91 (0.16) vs. 2.20 (0.22) and 2.27 (0.21), respectively). The difference in scores was significant only for the empathy-feedback VP versus the backstory VP group (P = 0.027). The SPs rated the empathy-feedback and the backstory VP groups significantly higher than the control VP group on offering empathic statements (P < 0.0001), appearing warm and caring (P = 0.015), and forming rapport (P = 0.004).
      CONCLUSIONS:
    Feedback on empathy in a VP interaction increased students' empathy in encounters with SPs, as rated by trained assessors, whereas a simulation of patient shadowing did not. Both VP interventions increased students' empathy as rated by SPs, compared with the control VP group.
  
        2.Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Aug 5:1-8. [Epub ahead of print]
      Case-based Learning Outperformed Simulation Exercises in Disaster Preparedness Education Among Nursing Trainees in India: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
      Aluisio AR1, Daniel P2, Grock A3, Freedman J2, Singh A4, Papanagnou D5, Arquilla B2.
  
      Abstract
      OBJECTIVE:
      In resource-constrained environments, appropriately employing triage in disaster situations is crucial. Although both case-based learning (CBL) and simulation exercises (SEs) commonly are utilized in teaching disaster preparedness to adult learners, there is no substantial evidence supporting one as a more efficacious methodology. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effectiveness of CBL versus SEs in addition to standard didactic instruction in knowledge attainment pertaining to disaster triage preparedness.
      METHODS:
    This RCT was performed during a one-day disaster preparedness course in Lucknow, India during October 2014. Following provision of informed consent, nursing trainees were randomized to knowledge assessment after didactic teaching (control group); didactic plus CBL (Intervention Group 1); or didactic plus SE (Intervention Group 2). The educational curriculum used the topical focus of triage processes during disaster situations. Cases for the educational intervention sessions were scripted, identical between modalities, and employed structured debriefing. Trained live actors were used for SEs. After primary assessment, the groups underwent crossover to take part in the alternative educational modality and were re-assessed. Two standardized multiple-choice question batteries, encompassing key core content, were used for assessments. A sample size of 48 participants was calculated to detect a ≥20% change in mean knowledge score (α=0.05; power=80%). Robustness of randomization was evaluated using X 2, anova, and t-tests. Mean knowledge attainment scores were compared using one- and two-sample t-tests for intergroup and intragroup analyses, respectively.
      RESULTS:
      Among 60 enrolled participants, 88.3% completed follow-up. No significant differences in participant characteristics existed between randomization arms. Mean baseline knowledge score in the control group was 43.8% (standard deviation=11.0%). Case-based learning training resulted in a significant increase in relative knowledge scores at 20.8% (P=0.003) and 10.3% (P=.033) in intergroup and intragroup analyses, respectively. As compared to control, SEs did not significantly alter knowledge attainment scores with an average score increase of 6.6% (P=.396). In crossover intra-arm analysis, SEs were found to result in a 26.0% decrement in mean assessment score (P < .001).
      CONCLUSIONS:
     Among nursing trainees assessed in this RCT, the CBL modality was superior to SEs in short-term disaster preparedness educational translation. Simulation exercises resulted in no detectable improvement in knowledge attainment in this population, suggesting that CBL may be utilized preferentially for adult learners in similar disaster training settings. Aluisio AR , Daniel P , Grock A , Freedman J , Singh A , Papanagnou D , Arquilla B . Case-based learning outperformed simulation exercises in disaster preparedness education among nursing trainees in India: a randomized controlled trial. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(5):1-8.
      PMID: 27491847 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
      Similar articles



     3. J Surg Educ. 2016 Jul 31. pii: S1931-7204(16)30090-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.06.014. [Epub ahead of print]
  
   Cadaver-Based Simulation Increases Resident Confidence, Initial Exposure to Fundamental    Techniques, and May Augment Operative Autonomy.
       Kim SC1, Fisher JG1, Delman KA1, Hinman JM1, Srinivasan JK2.

      Abstract
      OBJECTIVE:
     Surgical simulation is an important adjunct in surgical education. The majority of operative procedures can be simplified to core components. This study aimed to quantify a cadaver-based simulation course utility in improving exposure to fundamental maneuvers, resident and attending confidence in trainee capability, and if this led to earlier operative independence.
      DESIGN:
       A list of fundamental surgical procedures was established by a faculty panel. Residents were assigned to a group led by a chief resident. Residents performed skills on cadavers appropriate for PGY level. A video-recorded examination where they narrated and demonstrated a task independently was then graded by attendings using standardized rubrics. Participants completed surveys regarding improvements in knowledge and confidence.
      SETTING:
    The course was conducted at the Emory University School of Medicine and the T3 Laboratories in Atlanta, GA.
      PARTICIPANTS:
    A total of 133 residents and 41 attendings participated in the course. 133 (100%) participating residents and 32 (78%) attendings completed surveys.
      RESULTS:
      Resident confidence in completing the assigned skill independently increased from 3 (2-3) to 4 (3-4), p < 0.01. Residents stated that a median of 40% (interquartile range: 20%-60%) of procedures were performed for the first time in the course, and the same number had been performed only in the course. The percentage of skills attendings believed residents could perform independently increased from 40% (40%-60%) to 60% (60%->80%), p < 0.04. Attendings were more likely to grant autonomy in the operating room after this exercise (4 [3-5]).
      CONCLUSIONS:
      A cadaveric skills course focused on fundamental maneuvers with objective confirmation of success is a viable adjunct to clinical operative experience. Residents were formally exposed to fundamental surgical maneuvers earlier as a result of this course. This activity improved both resident and attending confidence in trainee operative skill, resulting in increased attending willingness to grant a higher level of autonomy in the operating room.

     4. Clin Teach. 2016 Aug 3. doi: 10.1111/tct.12558. [Epub ahead of print]

     Near-peer medical student simulation training.
     Cash T1, Brand E1, Wong E1, Richardson J1, Athorn S2, Chowdhury F3.
      Abstract
      BACKGROUND:
      There is growing concern that medical students are inadequately prepared for life as a junior doctor. A lack of confidence managing acutely unwell patients is often cited as a barrier to good clinical care. With medical schools investing heavily in simulation equipment, we set out to explore if near-peer simulation training is an effective teaching format.
      METHODS:
      Medical students in their third year of study and above were invited to attend a 90-minute simulation teaching session. The sessions were designed and delivered by final-year medical students using clinical scenarios mapped to the Sheffield MBChB curriculum. Candidates were required to assess, investigate and manage an acutely unwell simulated patient. Pre- and post-simulation training Likert scale questionnaires were completed relating to self-reported confidence levels. There is growing concern that medical students are inadequately prepared for life as a junior doctor RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 25 students (100% response rate); 52 per cent of students had no prior simulation experience. There were statistically significant improvements in self-reported confidence levels in each of the six areas assessed (p < 0.005). Thematic analysis of free-text comments indicated that candidates enjoyed the practical format of the sessions and found the experience useful.
      DISCUSSION:
     Our results suggest that near-peer medical student simulation training benefits both teacher and learner and that this simplistic model could easily be replicated at other medical schools. As the most junior members of the team, medical students are often confined to observer status. Simulation empowers students to practise independently in a safe and protected environment. Furthermore, it may help to alleviate anxiety about starting work as a junior doctor and improve future patient care.
      © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.
      PMID: 27488259 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
  
     5. BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Aug 2;15(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0143-2.
  
    The impact of a simulated intervention on attitudes of undergraduate nursing and medical students towards end of life care provision.
      Lewis C1, Reid J2, McLernon Z2, Ingham R3, Traynor M2.

      Abstract
      BACKGROUND:
    The concerns of undergraduate nursing and medical students' regarding end of life care are well documented. Many report feelings of emotional distress, anxiety and a lack of preparation to provide care to patients at end of life and their families. Evidence suggests that increased exposure to patients who are dying and their families can improve attitudes toward end of life care. In the absence of such clinical exposure, simulation provides experiential learning with outcomes comparable to that of clinical practice. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the impact of a simulated intervention on the attitudes of undergraduate nursing and medical students towards end of life care.
      METHODS:
     A pilot quasi-experimental, pretest-posttest design. Attitudes towards end of life care were measured using the Frommelt Attitudes Towards Care of the Dying Part B Scale which was administered pre and post a simulated clinical scenario. 19 undergraduate nursing and medical students were recruited from one large Higher Education Institution in the United Kingdom.
      RESULTS:
    The results of this pilot study confirm that a simulated end of life care intervention has a positive impact on the attitudes of undergraduate nursing and medical students towards end of life care (p < 0.001).
      CONCLUSIONS:
  Active, experiential learning in the form of simulation teaching helps improve attitudes of undergraduate nursing and medical students towards end of life. In the absence of clinical exposure, simulation is a viable alternative to help prepare students for their professional role regarding end of life care.
   
 6.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Jul 26. pii: S0301-5629(16)30152-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.06.021. [Epub ahead of print]

      Point of Care Ultrasound: A WFUMB Position Paper.
     Dietrich CF1, Goudie A2, Chiorean L3, Cui XW4, Gilja OH5, Dong Y6,Abramowicz JS7, Vinayak S8, Westerway SC9, Nolsøe CP10, Chou YH11, Blaivas M12.
  
     Abstract
      Over the last decade, the use of portable ultrasound scanners has enhanced the concept of point of care ultrasound (PoC-US), namely, "ultrasound performed at the bedside and interpreted directly by the treating clinician." PoC-US is not a replacement for comprehensive ultrasound, but rather allows physicians immediate access to clinical imaging for rapid and direct solutions. PoC-US has already revolutionized everyday clinical practice, and it is believed that it will dramatically change how ultrasound is applied in daily practice. However, its use and teaching are different from continent to continent and from country to country. This World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology position paper discusses the current status and future perspectives of PoC-US. Particular attention is given to the different uses of PoC-US and its clinical significance, including within emergency and critical care medicine, cardiology, anesthesiology, rheumatology, obstetrics, neonatology, gynecology, gastroenterology and many other applications. In the future, PoC-US will be more diverse than ever and be included in medical student training

      7. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2016 Jul-Sep;30(3):174-8. doi:
          10.1097/JPN.0000000000000173.

     Debriefing and Feedback in the Current Healthcare Environment.
     Hunter LA1.

      Abstract
      Over the past several decades, simulation-based learning and postsimulation debriefing have become a mainstay of clinical education in healthcare. With origins in both the military and aviation industries, debriefing in particular has been used across multiple nursing and medicine disciplines to promote team training and reflective learning. Self-reflection and improvement in practice are at the core of effective debriefing. Feedback and simulation experts have continued to develop more effective debriefing strategies. Several models are described in the literature, and healthcare educators now have a variety of resources at their disposal. Many of these debriefing techniques offer thoughtful guidance for providing constructive, real-time clinical feedback to students. Incorporating reflective feedback strategies in clinical learning promotes meaningful learning. This, in turn, will only strengthen the capabilities of students and better prepare them for the complexities they will face in clinical practice.
      PMID: 27465443 [PubMed - in process]

   8. Nurse Educ. 2016 Jul 21. [Epub ahead of print]

      Virtually Nursing: Emerging Technologies in Nursing Education.
       Foronda CL1, Alfes CM, Dev P, Kleinheksel AJ, Nelson DA Jr, OʼDonnell JM, Samosky JT.

       Abstract
   Augmented reality and virtual simulation technologies in nursing education are burgeoning. Preliminary evidence suggests that these innovative pedagogical approaches are effective. The aim of this article is to present 6 newly emerged products and systems that may improve nursing education. Technologies may present opportunities to improve teaching efforts, better engage students, and transform nursing education.
      PMID: 27454054 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
  
   9. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jul 12;45:120-125. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.07.002. [Epub ahead of print]

      The effects of using high-fidelity simulators and standardized patients on the thorax, lung, and cardiac examination skills of undergraduate nursing students.
      Tuzer H1, Dinc L2, Elcin M3.
  
      Abstract
      BACKGROUND:
     Existing research literature indicates that the use of various simulation techniques in the training of physical examination skills develops students' cognitive and psychomotor abilities in a realistic learning environment while improving patient safety.
      OBJECTIVES:
     The study aimed to compare the effects of the use of a high-fidelity simulator and standardized patients on the knowledge and skills of students conducting thorax-lungs and cardiac examinations, and to explore the students' views and learning experiences.
      DESIGN:
      A mixed-method explanatory sequential design.
      SETTINGS:
      The study was conducted in the Simulation Laboratory of a Nursing School, the Training Center at the Faculty of Medicine, and in the inpatient clinics of the Education and Research Hospital.
      PARTICIPANTS:
      Fifty-two fourth-year nursing students.
      METHODS:
    Students were randomly assigned to Group I and Group II. The students in Group 1 attended the thorax-lungs and cardiac examination training using a high-fidelity simulator, while the students in Group 2 using standardized patients. After the training sessions, all students practiced their skills on real patients in the clinical setting under the supervision of the investigator.
      RESULTS:
   Knowledge and performance scores of all students increased following the simulation activities; however, the students that worked with standardized patients achieved significantly higher knowledge scores than those that worked with the high-fidelity simulator; however, there was no significant difference in performance scores between the groups. The mean performance scores of students on real patients were significantly higher compared to the post-simulation assessment scores (p<0.001).
      CONCLUSIONS:
     Results of this study revealed that use of standardized patients was more effective than the use of a high-fidelity simulator in increasing the knowledge scores of students on thorax-lungs and cardiac examinations; however, practice on real patients increased performance scores of all students without any significant difference in two groups.

     10.   Cureus. 2016 Jun 19;8(6):e647. doi: 10.7759/cureus.647.
  
    Merging Problem-Based Learning with Simulation-Based Learning in the Medical Undergraduate Curriculum: The PAIRED Framework for Enhancing Lifelong Learning.
      Koh J1, Dubrowski A2.

      Abstract
     Lifelong learning is an essential trait that is expected of every physician. The CanMeds 2005 Physician Competency Framework emphasizes lifelong learning as a key competency that physicians must achieve in becoming better physicians. However, many physicians are not competent at engaging in lifelong learning. The current medical education system is deficient in preparing medical students to develop and carry out their own lifelong learning curriculum upon graduation. Despite understanding how physicians learn at work, medical students are not trained to learn while working. Similarly, although barriers to lifelong learning are known, medical students are not adequately skilled in overcoming these barriers. Learning to learn is just as important, if not more, as acquiring the skills and knowledge required of a physician. The medical undergraduate curriculum lacks a specific learning strategy to prepare medical students in becoming an adept lifelong learner. In this article, we propose a learning strategy for lifelong learning at the undergraduate level. In developing this novel strategy, we paid particular attention to two parameters. First, this strategy should be grounded on literature describing a physician's lifelong learning process. Second, the framework for implementing this strategy must be based on existing undergraduate learning strategies to obviate the need for additional resources, learner burden, and faculty time. In this paper, we propose a Problem, Analysis, Independent Research Reporting, Experimentation Debriefing (PAIRED) framework that follows the learning process of a physician and serves to synergize the components of problem-based learning and simulation-based learning in specifically targeting the barriers to lifelong learning.
  
    11.   BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 15;16(1):177.
  
    A simulated night shift in the emergency room increases students' self-efficacy independent of role taking over during simulation.
      Stroben F1,2, Schröder T3,4, Dannenberg KA3,5, Thomas A 4,Exadaktylos A6, Hautz WE6.

      Abstract
      BACKGROUND:
      Junior doctors do not feel well prepared when they start into postgraduate training. High self-efficacy however is linked to better clinical performance and may thus improve patient care. What factors affect self-efficacy is currently unknown. We conducted a simulated night shift in an emergency room (ER) with final-year medical students to identify factors contributing to their self-efficacy and thus inform simulation training in the ER.
      METHODS:
    We simulated a night in the ER using best educational practice including multi-source feedback, simulated patients and vicarious learning with 30 participants. Students underwent 7 prototypic cases in groups of 5 in different roles (leader, member and observer). Feeling of preparedness was measured at baseline and 5 days after the event. After every case students recorded their confidence dependent of their role during simulation and evaluated the case.
      RESULTS:
     Thirty students participated, 18 (60 %) completed all surveys. At baseline students feel unconfident (Mean -0.34). Feeling of preparedness increases significantly at follow up (Mean 0.66, p = 0.001, d = 1.86). Confidence after simulation is independent of the role during simulation (F(2,52) = 0.123, p = 0.884). Observers in a simulation can estimate leader's confidence independent of their own (r = 0.188, p = 0.32) while team members cannot (r = 0.61, p < 0.001).
      CONCLUSIONS:
      Simulation improves self-efficacy. The improvement of self-efficacy is independent of the role taken during simulation. As a consequence, groups can include observers as participants without impairing their increase in self-efficacy, providing a convenient way for educators to increase simulation efficiency. Different roles can furthermore be included into multi-source peer-feedback

   
     12.   N Z Med J. 2016 Aug 5;129(1439):59-67.

    Improved scores for observed teamwork in the clinical environment following a multidisciplinary operating room simulation intervention.
     Weller JM1, Cumin D2, Civil ID3, Torrie J4, Garden A5, MacCormick AD6,Gurusinghe N7, Boyd MJ8, Frampton C9, Cokorilo M10, Tranvik M10,Carlsson L10, Lee T11, Ng WL12, Crossan M13, Merry AF14.

       Abstract
       AIMS:
    We ran a Multidisciplinary Operating Room Simulation (MORSim) course for 20 complete general surgical teams from two large metropolitan hospitals. Our goal was to improve teamwork and communication in the operating room (OR). We hypothesised that scores for teamwork and communication in the OR would improve back in the workplace following MORSim. We used an extended Behavioural Marker Risk Index (BMRI) to measure teamwork and communication, because a relationship has previously been documented between BMRI scores and surgical patient outcomes.
      METHODS:
     Trained observers scored general surgical teams in the OR at the two study hospitals before and after MORSim, using the BMRI.
      RESULTS:
    Analysis of BMRI scores for the 224 general surgical cases before and 213 cases after MORSim showed BMRI scores improved by more than 20% (0.41 v 0.32, p<0.001). Previous research suggests that this improved teamwork score would translate into a clinically important reduction in complications and mortality in surgical patients.
       CONCLUSIONS:
      We demonstrated an improvement in scores for teamwork and communication in general surgical ORs following our intervention. These results support the use of simulation-based multidisciplinary team training for OR staff to promote better teamwork and communication, and potentially improve outcomes for general surgical patients